Cornell’s current Student Center was designed primarily for desktop workflows. However, many students check schedules, add courses, and manage enrollment while moving between classes or using their phones around campus.
This project explores how a mobile-first redesign could improve the enrollment experience by making actions faster, clearer, and less stressful.
The redesign focuses on reducing cognitive load, improving visibility of enrollment status, and guiding students safely through high-risk actions such as adding, dropping, and swapping courses.
Cornell’s Student Center was built for desktop workflows, yet students often manage enrollment on phones between classes. This project reimagines the enrollment experience as a mobile‑first UX with faster, clearer, and less stressful interactions. It focuses on reducing cognitive load, making status visible, and guiding users safely through add, drop, and swap actions.
To better understand how students interact with the enrollment system, I conducted informal interviews and walkthrough sessions with Cornell undergraduates during add/drop week.
Participants were asked to describe how they normally add, drop, or swap courses and were observed completing tasks inside Student Center.
Walkthrough sessions with students as they navigated the current enrollment interface.
During these conversations, several patterns emerged.
These observations revealed that the core issue was not only navigation complexity, but lack of confidence during high‑stakes enrollment actions.
I translated raw notes into grouped themes to guide design decisions. This helped me prioritize speed, trust during risky actions, reduced cognitive load, and better failure-state handling.
Based on the research insights, the main problem became clear.
Students need a faster and safer way to add, drop, and swap classes on mobile devices without feeling uncertain about the outcome of their actions. The current system slows decision-making because it requires navigating multiple pages and interpreting dense tables of information.
After synthesizing the research insights, I explored ways to restructure the enrollment experience for mobile use. Brainstorming focused on improving four aspects of the current system:
One important concept that emerged was shifting enrollment from a form-based system into a guided workflow. Instead of asking students to navigate complex tables and forms, the redesigned experience would guide them through a step-by-step process for adding, dropping, or swapping classes.
Another idea involved replacing dense course tables with card-based layouts, allowing students to quickly scan course names, seat availability, and class times.
These ideas helped establish the foundation for the wireframe prototypes.
Mid-fidelity wireframes were created to test navigation structure and enrollment flows before moving into visual design. The wireframes focused on several key improvements.
Key flows designed during this stage included:
These wireframes allowed rapid iteration on layout and interaction patterns before introducing branding and visual styling.
Early wireframes exploring guided enrollment steps, simplified cards, schedule visibility, and strong confirmation patterns.
After validating the enrollment flows through mid-fidelity wireframes, high-fidelity screens were created to refine typography, color hierarchy, and visual clarity.
The final design introduces several improvements.
Cornell’s red color was used as the primary accent to maintain institutional branding while highlighting important actions.
Final mobile designs demonstrating the guided enrollment flow, strong confirmation feedback, and reduced cognitive load.
To evaluate the usability of the redesigned interface, quick usability testing sessions were conducted with Cornell students. Participants were asked to complete three common tasks using the prototype:
Students were able to complete these tasks faster and with less hesitation compared to the current Student Center interface. Participants noted that the swap preview helped them feel more confident about replacing a course. The visual schedule blocks made time conflicts easier to understand. Confirmation screens clearly communicated when enrollment actions were successful.
These results suggest that improving visibility, system feedback, and structured workflows can significantly reduce uncertainty during enrollment.